Study links abortion access to women’s economic outcomes

Access to safe, legal abortion can be a lifelong economic stratifier, according to a new analysis of a national database of adolescent health information.

The new study assesses abortion and socioeconomic outcomes in two ways, both using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health).

First, the authors analyzed the relationship between living one’s teenage years in a region with abortion restrictions and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Second, they compared adult outcomes between adolescent girls who became teen moms and those girls who avoided teen parenthood because they had an abortion.

The authors found that adolescents in regions with fewer abortion restrictions and those who reported having an abortion were more likely to have graduated from college, earn higher incomes and have greater financial stability at two time-points over an almost 25-year period. Girls who became teen moms, conversely, were more likely to experience eviction, debt and food insecurity.

One in four women will have had an abortion before the end of her reproductive years, more than half of whom are already mothers. Surveys show that the main reason women say they have an abortion is because they can’t afford to raise a child or raise more children. As abortion access and policy shift wildly in the United States, it’s crucial to understand how abortion access impacts women’s socioeconomic futures.

“Childbearing is one of the most consequential decisions women will make in their lives, and their partner and family’s lives,” said Bethany Everett, sociologist at the University of Utah and lead author of the study. “If we’re going to pass policies that ban or restrict abortion, we should understand how they will impact women’s lives and society more broadly.”

The study was published in the American Sociological Review on Nov. 11, 2024.

Abortion: A mechanism for economic stratification

Abortion is still a stigmatized and sometimes illegal medical procedure, which has made scholarship on the topic difficult as women have historically underreported their abortions. This study aimed to fill the knowledge gap using Add Health, a 24-year survey tracking Americans’ well-being as they transition to adulthood, which includes participants’ complete reproductive histories.

The first study participants were surveyed in 1994 from 80 high schools and 52 middle schools, when they were between the ages of 12 and 19. A subsample of nearly 21,000 students were asked to complete additional in-home interviews at multiple subsequent points in their lives, referred to as “waves.”

The surveyors checked in with participants for their socioeconomic attainment at Wave IV (ages 24–32, between 2001–2003) and Wave V (ages 34–43 between 2016–2018).

The study is the first to link abortion policy at the macro-level to outcomes at the individual-level. Using Add Health data, the authors assessed state- and county-level abortion restrictions for the region where each participant lived when they were between 12 and 19 years old.

The authors used four indicators to determine the degree of abortion restriction: Did the state allow Medicare to fund abortions only in limited cases (rape, incest or life endangerment) or in all circumstances; parental consent requirements; did the respondent’s home county have an abortion provider; and state-level mandatory waiting periods and informed consent.

The authors then analyzed the relationship between restrictive abortion environments and the individual’s socioeconomic outcome at Waves IV (age 24–32) and V (age 34–43). They controlled for other variables that might influence an individual’s later status, including family income, education attainment and other state- and community- level variables.

By 34 to 43 years old, women who lived in less restrictive abortion environments were more likely to have graduated from college and score lower on multiple indicators of poverty and economic insecurity than those living in states and counties with higher abortion restrictions.

“Abortion is extremely hard to measure because there is so much stigma surrounding the procedure that even on anonymous surveys, people are reluctant to report having had one. Using policy measures avoids the measurement issues associated with self-reported data and instead captures the influence of abortion policy on access,” Everett said.

“Given that one in four women will have an abortion, these measures impact a broad swath of the population.”

For the second approach, the authors only compared women who had a teen pregnancy that ended either in a live birth or an abortion. They matched individuals who shared demographic characteristics, such as adolescent poverty, and mental health, but who differed in how their pregnancy ended.

In both studies, the authors found that relationships between measures of abortion were less consistently associated with employment compared to other measures of economic outcomes. However, those who had live births consistently had lower incomes, suggesting that abortion restriction and/or having an abortion is a factor in socioeconomic stratification in the U.S.

“In this current political climate, people pit concerns about the economy against concerns about social issues, such as abortion rights. However, our results show that this is a false choice,” said Catherine Taylor, associate professor of sociology at University of California, Santa Barbara, and co-author of the study.

“In reality, policies around abortion have a lot of economic impact and taking away access to abortion causes economic problems for many women and families.”