UK minister calls TikTok desirable product but admits āgenuine concernsā | TikTok
TikTokās power to deliver āexhilarationā and the UKās relationship with China are shaping the UK governmentās acceptance of the short video app despite āgenuine concernsā about how the data of millions of Britons may be used, the technology secretary has said.
After the US courts upheld a law that could lead to the platform being banned or sold in the US, Peter Kyle told the Guardian: āI am genuinely concerned about the ownership model of TikTok. Iām genuinely concerned about their use of data, linked to the ownership model.ā
But, as Donald Trump announced a presidential executive order pausing the US ban for 75 days, Kyle described it as a ādesirable productā and said it was important āthat young people should be free to explore all sorts of cultures and ideologiesā. Amid fears it could be used for Chinese propaganda, he said the UKās position towards the app involved āgetting that balance rightā with āthe sort of exhilarationā TikTok can deliver to users.
A recent Rutgers University study suggested āheavy users of TikTok [in the US] demonstrated a roughly 50% increase in pro-China attitudes compared [with] non-usersā and there is concern that the Chinese government can access data gathered by the app. It claimed TikTok amplified irrelevant or clickbait material to crowd out āposts about alleged Chinese Communist party abuses and suppressed anti-China content using moderation algorithmsā.
It concluded: āTikTokās content may contribute to psychological manipulation of users, aligning with the CCPās strategic objective of shaping favourable perceptions among young audiences.ā TikTok called it āa flawed experimentā.
Asked about those findings Kyle said: āWe urge caution over TikTok ā¦ but ā¦ there are lots of platforms and traditional broadcasters that have editorial decision-making decisions which do lead to biases.ā This was not a new phenomenon, he added.
He said the government monitored trends on social media, and āwhere we do see trends which are harmful to our national security or harmful to our way of life, then of course we start actingā.
Asked if the monitoring had raised concerns about TikTok as a propaganda vehicle, he replied that if there were, āwe would act publicly ā¦ Thereās no concerns that we have about social media activity that we are keeping from the public.ā
He also said: āWe are very mindful of the relationship that we have with China, with countries which are hostile to [our way] of lifeā, with an aide later clarifying he meant countries other than China.
Kyle indicated he drew lessons from the US moves to ban TikTok, which āmeant in reality ā¦ that people were suddenly going directly to the Chinese version of the app, which was almost certainly harvesting data and information and feeding propaganda in a way that the American version might not have beenā.
A TikTok spokesperson stressed that in the UK, the app was provided by a UK-registered and regulated company. They said it had been spending Ā£10bn to protect user data in the UK and Europe with data security āindependently monitored, checked and verifiedā.
It said the Chinese government had no stake or ownership in the parent company, Bytedance, which is majorityowned by international investors. It is 20% owned by its founder, Zhang Yiming.
In 2018, Zhang posted a āself-confessionā announcing he would close one of his apps as it featured content āincommensurate with socialist core values that did not properly implement public opinion guidanceā. After criticism on state TV he said a cause of his companyās problems was āa weak [understanding and implementation of] the āfour consciousnessesā, a political theory advanced by the leader of the Chinese Communist party, Xi Jinping.
#minister #calls #TikTok #desirable #product #admits #genuine #concerns #TikTok