Scientific American Editor Resigns After Saying Trump Supporters are the ā€˜Meanest, Dumbest, Most Bigotedā€™ Voters

by Pelican Press
14 views 5 minutes read

Scientific American Editor Resigns After Saying Trump Supporters are the ā€˜Meanest, Dumbest, Most Bigotedā€™ Voters

Laura Helmuth, the former chief editor of Scientific American, resigned Thursday after messages she posted on Bluesky about Trump supporters were shared in conservative circles. In a since-deleted message, Helmuth described some Trump voters as ā€œthe meanest, dumbest, most bigotedā€ people.

Helmuth also lamented that her generation of voters is ā€œso full of fā€“king fascists.

Iā€™ve decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor in chief. Iā€™m going to take some time to think about what comes next (and go birdwatching), but for now Iā€™d like to share a very small sample of the work Iā€™ve been so proud to support (thread)

ā€” Laura Helmuth (@laurahelmuth.bsky.social) 2024-11-14T19:23:01.434Z

ā€œIā€™ve decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor in chief. Iā€™m going to take some time to think about what comes next (and go birdwatching), but for now Iā€™d like to share a very small sample of the work Iā€™ve been so proud to support,ā€ Helmuth wrote on the social media platform.

She followed that message with links to several articles from the publication and later added an apology for her messages about the election.

ā€œThese posts, which I have deleted, do not reflect my beliefs; they were a mistaken expression of shock and confusion about the election results,ā€ Helmuth explained.

She concluded, ā€œI could go on all day, but for now I want to end by saying that we CAN make things better, or at least try to stop things from getting worse. We fixed acid rain. People survive HIV/AIDS. There are bald eagles everywhere! We have vaccines against cancer! And the way things get better is ā€¦ Things get better through long-term thinking, investments in research, wide and welcoming collaborations, honest education, mentorship and sponsorship, not catastrophizing failure, justice, hope, and solidarity.ā€

This yearā€™s election marked the second time in 180 years that Scientific American endorsed a presidential candidate. In their September endorsement, the editors of the outlet offered a comprehensive comparison of Harris policies (and Biden-Harris policies) and Trump policies.

ā€œAt the top of the ballot, Harris does deserve our vote. She offers us a way forward lit by rationality and respect for all,ā€ the editors wrote. They added, ā€œOne of two futures will materialize according to our choices in this election. Only one is a vote for reality and integrity. We urge you to vote for Kamala Harris.ā€

Helmutā€™s resignation was met with support for her work at the magazine. Writer and science journalist Sabrina Imbler wrote on Bluesky, ā€œLaura Helmuthā€™s impact on Scientific American & science journalism is immeasurable. She demonstrated how a major legacy publication could be a moral one: rigorous reporting on the climate crisis & untangling how science is political, such as explaining why trans kids deserve gender-affirming care.ā€

The post Scientific American Editor Resigns After Saying Trump Supporters are the ā€˜Meanest, Dumbest, Most Bigotedā€™ Voters appeared first on TheWrap.



Source link

#Scientific #American #Editor #Resigns #Trump #Supporters #Meanest #Dumbest #Bigoted #Voters

Add Comment

You may also like