The R.N.C. Begins – The New York Times

by Pelican Press
18 views 6 minutes read

The R.N.C. Begins – The New York Times

The dizzying swirl of the 2024 presidential campaign will continue this week.

Just two days after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, the Republican National Convention begins today in Milwaukee. In Washington, meanwhile, Democrats seem set to spend another week agonizing over whether President Biden is too old and politically damaged to be their party’s nominee.

Here is the latest Times coverage:

In a short Oval Office address last night, Biden condemned the attack on Trump and urged Americans to “lower the temperature” and reject violence. “Politics must never be a literal battlefield and, god forbid, a killing field,” Biden said.

The gunman appears to have acted alone, and his family is cooperating with investigators. The F.B.I. is trying to break into his phone to figure out his motive.

Officials identified the spectator who was killed at the rally as Corey Comperatore, a 50-year-old volunteer firefighter who shielded his family members from gunfire. The shooting also wounded a Marine Corps veteran and a 74-year-old man; both are in stable condition.

The Secret Service is under scrutiny: Biden ordered an independent review of the rally, and members of Congress said they planned to hold hearings.

Trump arrived in Milwaukee, where convention delegates will officially nominate him for president today. Officials are trying to assure the thousands of attendees that security will be tight.

Biden will sit for an interview with Lester Holt of NBC News tonight, continuing his push to prove himself after his poor debate performance. NBC plans to run the interview unedited.

For the latest on the assassination investigation and the campaign, follow live Times coverage today.

Baby profits

By Sarah Kliff

I’m an investigative health care reporter.

Americans spend more on childbirth than nearly anything else that happens at the hospital. The average delivery is $13,000. Even after insurance pays, patients who have babies still end up on the hook for nearly $3,000.

I’ve spent 15 years covering the high costs of American health care, an industry in which patients routinely encounter $600 Band-Aids and $3,000 Covid tests. Recently, I’ve been amazed at how much hospitals, doctors and medical device companies are charging families for newborn care.

They are eking out more money from each step of having a baby. They often tap into the anxiety that so many parents feel as they form new families. “People are willing to do anything to ensure the well-being of their kids even before they meet them,” said Neel Shah, chief medical officer at Maven, a women’s health clinic.

Moneymakers

Health care companies have several chances to make their pitch between a positive pregnancy test and the birth of a child.

In the first trimester, genetic companies sell tests that claim to detect serious and rare problems from a few vials of the mother’s blood. But these tests, which can cost thousands of dollars, are usually wrong when they make grave predictions about an infant’s health. The inaccurate results can lead parents to spend thousands on more tests and even to consider abortion.

The second trimester often brings a pitch for umbilical-cord blood banking. Brochures in obstetricians’ offices describe how paying to freeze and store a newborn’s stem cells may be vital if the child becomes ill later in life. But the few parents who try to use their samples often find that they are unusable, either because they have too few stem cells or because they are contaminated. Azeen Ghorayshi and I investigated these companies in a story The Times published today.

Most spending on childbirth goes toward delivery and newborn care. Cesarean section delivery remains the most common surgery in American hospitals, despite years of advocacy to lessen its use. About 30 percent of kids are born this way, more than twice the World Health Organization’s recommendation.

One reason is that we have bizarre incentives. Hospitals earn 50 percent more for C-sections than for vaginal deliveries, even though recent research shows they cost less than vaginal deliveries. When cheaper medical care earns more money, that warps behavior.

Neonatal intensive care is also proving to be very profitable. Nearly 40 percent more babies went to these units, supposedly reserved for the sickest kids, from 2008 to 2018. But the infants weren’t sicker. Some doctors worry that hospitals may send healthy babies to the NICU because it pays better. Investors, seeing the opportunity, have been buying up neonatology practices.

Capitalizing on fear

The experts I talked to have a few explanations for why these efforts work. To start, there are millions of births every year. Hospitals know that childbirth will always make up a large share of their revenue.

Another reason is that the most successful messages — the case for banking cord blood, buying advanced genetic tests or spending a few extra nights in the NICU — are selling safety for your child.

Lastly, these pitches tend to come from a trusted source: our doctors. They distribute brochures that overstate the benefits of cord blood banking or genetic testing. Cord blood banks even pay obstetricians to collect the stem cells. When your doctor endorses a new and promising technology, it is awfully hard to say no.

THE LATEST NEWSInternational

The threats of climate change and artificial intelligence have some Americans fearing the end of the world. Drew Miller, a retired Air Force colonel, has an answer to those anxieties: Fortitude Ranch, a collection of survivalist compounds across the U.S. He and other so-called “preppers” are betting that doomsday can be good for business.

More on culture


Source link

#R.N.C #Begins #York #Times

Add Comment

You may also like